Case Overview

Type: Roundup — Fee & Charge Class Action Settlements

Updated: May 2026

Cases Covered: 4

Hidden Fees, ATM Charges, and Serving Size Deception: May 2026 Class Action Roundup

From bank ATMs to waterpark ticket booths, a fresh wave of class action settlements and lawsuits filed in May 2026 centers on one familiar theme: consumers paying more than they were led to expect. Several cases are moving toward resolution—and at least one new lawsuit is just getting started.

Whether you've used a Bank of America card at a 7-Eleven, held an account at Equity Bank, visited Splish Splash waterpark, or picked up coffee creamer at Target, here's what you need to know about the cases that may affect you.

1. Bank of America 7-Eleven ATM Fees

Settlement Amount: $2.25 million

Who May Qualify: Bank of America accountholders who were charged out-of-network ATM fees at 7-Eleven ATM locations during the relevant class period

Claim Deadline: Check the settlement administrator's site for current deadlines

The lawsuit alleges that Bank of America charged accountholders multiple out-of-network fees when they used 7-Eleven ATMs—fees the plaintiffs claim were improper or exceeded what customers were led to expect. According to the complaint, affected customers were charged in a manner inconsistent with their account terms.

Bank of America has agreed to a $2.25 million settlement to resolve these claims, without admitting wrongdoing. Eligible accountholders may receive a portion of the settlement fund depending on the number of valid claims submitted.

How to claim: Visit the settlement administrator's official website for claim instructions. Proof of ATM transactions may be required.

2. Equity Bank Overdraft and NSF Fees

Settlement Amount: $1 million

Who May Qualify: Equity Bank accountholders who were charged overdraft fees or nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees during the applicable class period

Claim Deadline: Check the settlement administrator's site for current deadlines

The class action against Equity Bank alleges the institution improperly charged customers overdraft and nonsufficient funds fees in ways that violated account agreements or consumer protection standards. Cases involving overdraft fee practices have proliferated in recent years, with banks facing scrutiny over how and when such fees are triggered.

Under the proposed $1 million settlement, eligible accountholders could automatically receive cash payments or have outstanding fees forgiven—potentially without needing to file a claim. The settlement has not yet received final court approval.

How to claim: Some class members may receive payments automatically. Visit the settlement site or watch for mailed notice to confirm your status and any required steps.

3. Splish Splash Waterpark Hidden Processing Fees

Settlement Amount: $1 million

Who May Qualify: Consumers who purchased tickets to Splish Splash waterpark (operated by Festival Fun Parks) and were charged undisclosed processing fees during the relevant period

Claim Deadline: Check the settlement administrator's site for current deadlines

The lawsuit alleges that Festival Fun Parks failed to adequately disclose processing fees at the time tickets were advertised or initially priced for Splish Splash, a waterpark on Long Island, New York. According to the complaint, customers were not made aware of these charges until late in the purchasing process—a practice critics and regulators have increasingly characterized as "drip pricing."

Festival Fun Parks has agreed to a $1 million settlement to resolve these allegations without admitting liability. The case reflects a broader regulatory environment in which hidden ticketing and processing fees have drawn attention from the Federal Trade Commission, which has identified junk fees as an enforcement priority.

How to claim: Visit the official settlement website for eligibility details and claim submission instructions. Documentation of ticket purchases may strengthen a claim.

4. Target Market Pantry Coffee Creamer — New Lawsuit Filed

Settlement Amount: None yet — lawsuit pending

Who May Qualify: Consumers who purchased Target's Market Pantry Original Coffee Creamer powder based on its advertised serving count

Status: Newly filed class action; no settlement reached

This case is at an earlier stage than the others in this roundup. A newly filed class action lawsuit alleges that Target misrepresented the number of servings contained in its Market Pantry Original Coffee Creamer powder. According to the complaint, the product's packaging advertises a specific number of servings, but the actual contents allegedly yield fewer—meaning consumers may be paying for more product than the container delivers.

The plaintiff claims that had she known the accurate serving count, she would not have purchased the product at the stated price, or would have paid significantly less. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of consumers who purchased the product nationwide.

No settlement has been announced. The case will need to proceed through the court system before any resolution is reached.

How to follow: Monitor court filings and class action news outlets for updates on certification and potential settlement talks.

Key Takeaways

• Bank and financial fee cases continue to generate significant settlements. Both the Bank of America and Equity Bank cases involve charges that plaintiffs allege went beyond what customers agreed to or were clearly disclosed—a recurring theme in consumer financial litigation.
• Hidden fees at the point of purchase remain a litigation target. The Splish Splash case illustrates that processing fees added during online checkout—without prominent upfront disclosure—continue to attract class action scrutiny, particularly as the FTC has signaled aggressive enforcement in this space.
• Some settlements may pay out automatically. The Equity Bank settlement, if approved, could deliver cash or fee forgiveness to eligible customers without requiring a formal claim. Checking your mail for class notice is a simple step that could result in compensation.
• New lawsuits, like the Target coffee creamer case, can take months or years to resolve. Following these cases early puts consumers in a position to act when a settlement is eventually reached.
• Deadlines matter. Settlement claims windows can close quickly and are rarely extended. If you believe you may qualify for any resolved case, verifying the deadline should be your first step.

Have you filed a claim in any of these settlements? Share your experience in the comments below.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Eligibility for any settlement can only be determined by reviewing official settlement documents or consulting a qualified attorney.